What Is the Tone of This Excerpt From Mark Twain s Mental Telegraphy Again I

Another of those apparently trifling things has happened to me which puzzle and perplex all men every now and then, keep them thinking an hour or two, and leave their minds barren of caption or solution at last.

Here it is—and information technology looks inconsequential enough, I am obliged to say. A few days ago I said, "It must be that Frank Millet doesn't know we are in Germany, or he would accept written long before this. I have been on the indicate of dropping him a line at least a dozen times during the by half dozen weeks, only I always decided to wait a mean solar day or two longer and see if we shouldn't hear from him. Merely now I will write." So I did. I directed the letter to Paris and thought, "Now we shall hear from him before this letter is fifty miles from Heidelberg—it always happens and so."

Truthful enough, just why should it? That is the puzzling role of it. We are always talking most letters "crossing" each other, for that is i of the very commonest accidents of this life. We telephone call it "accident," but perhaps nosotros misname it. Nosotros have the instinct a dozen times a year that the letter we are writing is going to "cantankerous" the other person'southward letter; and if the reader will rack his retention a little, he will recall the fact that this presentiment had force enough to it to make him cutting his letter downwardly to a decided briefness, considering information technology would be a waste of fourth dimension to write a letter of the alphabet which was going to "cross," and hence be a useless letter. I think that in my experience this instinct has by and large come to me in cases where I had put off my alphabetic character a expert while in the hope that the other person would write.

Now I come up to the oddest thing that ever happened to me. Ii or three years agone, I was lying in bed, idly musing, one morning—it was the second of March—when all of a sudden a red-hot new idea came whistling down into my camp and exploded with such comprehensive effectiveness equally to sweep the vicinity make clean of rubbishy reflections and fill the air with their dust and flying fragments. This idea, stated in simple phrase, was that the time was ripe and the market ready for a certain volume, a book which ought to be written at once, a book which must command attention and exist of peculiar interest—to wit, a book about the Nevada argent mines. The "Peachy Bonanza" was a new wonder then, and everybody was talking about information technology. It seemed to me that the person best qualified to write this book was Mr. William H. Wright, a journalist of Virginia Metropolis, Nevada, past whose side I had scribbled many months when I was a reporter there ten or twelve years earlier. He might be alive still; he might be dead; I could not tell, merely I would write him anyway.

I began by merely and modestly suggesting that he make such a book, just my involvement grew as I went on, and I ventured to map out what I thought ought to be the plan of the work, he existence an old friend and not given to taking good intentions for ill. I fifty-fifty dealt with details and suggested the order and sequence which they should follow. I was most to put the manuscript in an envelope when the thought occurred to me that if this book should exist written at my suggestion and then no publisher happened to want it, I should experience uncomfortable, so I concluded to keep my letter back until I should have secured a publisher. I pigeonholed my document and dropped a annotation to my own publisher, asking him to name a day for a business consultation. He was out of town on a far journey. My note remained unanswered, and at the finish of three or four days, the whole matter had passed out of my mind.

On the ninth of March, the postman brought three or four messages, and amid them a thick one whose superscription was in a hand which seemed dimly familiar to me. I could non "identify" it at outset, but presently I succeeded. So I said to a visiting relative who was present, "Now I will do a phenomenon. I will tell yous everything this letter contains—date, signature, and all—without breaking the seal. It is from a Mr. Wright, of Virginia City, Nevada, and is dated the 2d of March—vii days ago. Mr. Wright proposes to make a volume most the silver mines and the Swell Bonanza and asks what I, as a friend, think of the idea. He says his subjects are to be so-and-so, their order and sequence then-and-so, and he will close with a history of the master feature of the volume, the Dandy Bonanza." I opened the letter and showed that I had stated the date and the contents correctly. Mr. Wright's letter simply contained what my own letter of the alphabet, written on the same date, independent, and mine still lay in its pigeonhole, where it had been lying during the seven days since information technology was written.

There was no clairvoyance almost this, if I rightly comprehend what clairvoyance is. I call up the clear-sighted professes to actually encounter curtained writing and read it off word for discussion. This was not my case. I only seemed to know, and to know absolutely, the contents of the alphabetic character in detail and due order, but I had to word them myself. I translated them, so to speak, out of Wright's language into my ain.

Wright'southward letter and the one which I had written to him merely never sent were in substance the same. Necessarily, this could non come up by accident; such elaborate accidents cannot happen. Take a chance might accept duplicated 1 or ii of the details, but she would have broken downwards on the residue. I could not doubt—there was no tenable reason for doubting—that Mr. Wright'due south mind and mine had been in close and crystal-articulate communication with each other across three thousand miles of mountain and desert on the forenoon of the 2nd of March. I did not consider that both minds originated that succession of ideas, but that one listen originated them and just telegraphed them to the other.

The existent problem is not whether machines call back but whether men do.

I was curious to know which encephalon was the telegrapher and which the receiver, so I wrote and asked for particulars. Mr. Wright's reply showed that his mind had done the originating and telegraphing and mine the receiving. Marker that pregnant affair, now: consider for a moment how many a first-class "original" idea has been unconsciously stolen from a man iii thousand miles away! If one should question that this is so, let him expect into the encyclopedia and con in one case more that curious matter in the history of inventions which has puzzled everyone so much—that is, the frequency with which the aforementioned machine or other contrivance has been invented at the aforementioned time past several persons in different quarters of the globe. The world was without an electric telegraph for several yard years—and then Professor Henry, the American; Wheatstone in England; Morse on the ocean; and a German language in Munich all invented it at the aforementioned time. The discovery of certain ways of applying steam was made in two or three countries in the same year. Is it not possible that inventors are constantly and unwittingly stealing each other's ideas whilst they stand thousands of miles asunder?

This age does seem to have wearied invention nearly. All the same, it has i important contract on its hands notwithstanding—the invention of the phrenophone, that is to say, a method whereby the communicating of mind with heed may be brought under control and reduced to certainty and organisation. The telegraph and the phone are going to become too slow and wordy for our needs. We must have the thought itself shot into our minds from a distance. Then if we need to put information technology into words, we can exercise that irksome work at our leisure. Doubtless the something which conveys our thoughts through the air from brain to brain is a finer and subtler course of electricity, and all nosotros demand do is to find out how to capture information technology and how to force information technology to exercise its work, as we have had to practice in the instance of the electric currents. Before the day of telegraphs, neither 1 of these marvels would have seemed any easier to achieve than the other.

While I am writing this, doubtless somebody on the other side of the earth is writing information technology, too. The question is, am I inspiring him or is he inspiring me? I cannot answer that, but that these thoughts have been passing through somebody else'southward mind all the time I have been setting them down, I have no sort of doubt.

From "Mental Telegraphy." A member of the English Society for Psychical Research from 1884 to 1902, the American writer began recording telepathic experiences in his notebooks beginning in the 1870s. Though typically private most these beliefs, he published this essay in Harper's New Monthly Magazine, along with a follow-upwardly article, "Mental Telegraphy Again," four years later. "I imagine that we get most of our thoughts out of somebody else's head, by mental telegraphy," he wrote in his autobiography, "and non e'er out of the heads of acquaintances only, in the majority of cases, out of the heads of strangers."

Back to Issue

kellamcommusithad.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/technology/hive-mind

Share this post